Wednesday, September 24, 2008

5 Army chiefs have P1.6-billion unliquidated cash advances

5 Army chiefs have P1.6-billion unliquidated cash advances

Daily Tribune 09/25/2008

The Philippine Army leaderships have accumulated P1.6 billion in unliquidated cash advances from 2003 to 2007.

Bayan Muna party-list Rep. Satur Ocampo, citing reports from the Commission on Audit (CoA), yesterday said of the five Army chiefs, former Lt. Gen. Efren Abu, now special envoy to Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines-East Asian Growth Area (BIMP-EAGA), accumulated the bulk of the unliquidated cash advances with P997.44 million in 2003.

CoA also listed Lt. Gen. Generoso Senga, ambassador to Iran, as having P103.51 million in unliquidated cash advances in 2004.

In 2005, Lt. Gen. Hermogenes Esperon Jr., now presidential adviser on the peace process, amassed P69.84 million in unliquidated cash advances.

In 2006, Lt. Gen. Romeo Tolentino was listed as having P90.07 million in unliquidated cash advances.

Lt. Gen. Alexander Yano still has to liquidate P335.64 million of his cash advances in 2007.

All in all, the total unliquidated cash advances run to around P1.6 billion.

The CoA rendered an adverse opinion on the fairness of presentation of the consolidated financial statements of the Philippine Army for each year due to unliquidated cash advances for payroll and travel of officials, among many others, Ocampo stressed.

It is actually a challenge to current Army chief Lt. Gen. Victor Ibrado to clean up the infantry divisions (IDs) and brigades across the country which recorded unliquidated cash advances, inappropriate use of these advances and the non-distribution of combat clothing and individual equipment (CCIE) in some of the Army's biggest divisions, the militant lawmaker said.

In 2007, the non-distribution of CCIE in the 5th and 7th IDs alone amounted to P5.77 million.

There were also overpayments to Citizens Auxiliary Forces Geographic Unit active auxiliaries who were either already terminated (P1.95 million in the 5th, 7th and 8th IDs) with double entries of the same personnel or same serial numbers (P2.59 million in the 6th ID), Ocampo said.

This may be only the tip of the iceberg of AFP corruption. The House should consider inserting special provisions in the Army and AFP budgets, requiring them to accomplish these CoA recommendations.

Among CoA's recommendations to the Philippine Army are: strictly adhere to the CoA rules on the grant, utilization and liquidation of cash advances; and, impose penal/administrative sanctions to those who continue to neglect their obligation.

Apparently, the Army has ignored these recommendations. This unchecked bad practice of the Army affects the lower-rank and foot soldiers the most, he noted. Charlie V. Manalo

Labels: ,

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Transparency International (TI) Survey: Corruption in RP at its worst

CPI rating of 2.3 lowest since start of transparency poll
Corruption in RP at its worst, TI survey shows

09/24/2008
The Arroyo administration reached another milestone yesterday after the Philippines' ranking in the yearly Corruption Perception Index (CPI) of watchdog Transparency International (TI) fell to 2.3 points out of a possible 10, the lowest ever for the country and one of the worst in the world since the survey was started in 1996.
The Philippines landed 141st out of 180 countries ranked in this year's survey and it was bracketed with Yemen, Cameroon and Iran.
In the Asian region, the country's corruption rating was 25th of 32 countries, ahead only of Timor-Leste, Bangladesh, Laos, Papua New Guinea, Cambodia, Afghanistan and Myanmar.
Among major Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean), the country got the lowest score with even Indonesia ranking ahead with 2.6 points and Vietnam, 2.7 points rating.
Transparency International Philippines chairman Dolores Espanol said the progressive slide in the country's CPI ranking reflects the perception on the current government and failure of its programs to fight corruption.
Most of the programs undertaken against corruption under the current dispensation are superficial.
If the government is serious in addressing corruption, it should have been pursuing the many reports coming out concerning irregularities in government and pursue this until perpetrators are penalized, Espanol told the Tribune yesterday.
The corruption situation in the country is worsening and the government should delve into the root of each case after filing it in court. These cases should then be followed through until terminated, she said.

Labels: , ,

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Northrail got $500M more in China loans

TOTAL COST OF PROJECT BLOATS TO $1B

Northrail got $500M more in China loans

Daily Tribune
By Chito Lozada Associate Editor

09/22/2008

The government acquired another $500 million official loan from China in Jan. 15 last year on top of the $421.5 million initial borrowings in 2004 for the controversial North Luzon Railways project, jacking up the cost of the project to more than a mind-boggling $1 billion, including the penalties for the delays on the project�s first phase, documents obtained by The Tribune showed.

The new loan was a preferential buyer�s credit loan agreement signed between the Chinese state funding agency Export Import Bank of China (China Exim Bank) and the Department of Finance (DoF) on Jan. 15, 2007.

A source said the signing of the agreement was made during the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) summit in Cebu City that was being held at that time where Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao was in attendance.

Based on the documents, the state-owned North Luzon Railways Corp., which is undertaking the project, obtained the loan to fund a contract with China National Machinery Industry (SinoMach), which was the former China National Machinery and

Equipment Corp. (CNMEG), for the development, rehabilitation, construction, supply of equipment and diesel multiple units for Northrail project phase 1, section 2 which has a total cost of $586.91 million.

Phase 1, section 1 of the project worth $503 million was also commissioned with CNMEG and a separate $400-million Buyer�s Credit Loan Agreement from China�s Eximbank was obtained on Feb. 26, 2004 for its funding.

The Commission on Audit (CoA) had questioned the signing of the second contract because of the various problems encountered in the local counterpart financing for the initial phase of the project.

�No Certificate of Availability of Funds (CAF) was issued for the contract entered into by and between Northrail and Sinomach for the construction of Northrail Project phase 1, section 2 as required under Section 86 of PD 1445,� the CA stated.

The contract was also executed despite the various unresolved issues on the previous supply contract agreement between CNMEG and Northrail and the delayed implementation of Phase 1, Section 1 of the project, it added.

The National Economic Development Authority (Neda) board and the Cabinet-level Investment Coordinating Council approved phase 1, section 1 on December, 2003 which covered the construction of the railway from Caloocan City to Malolos, Bulacan. The Neda-Regional Development Council (RDC) III also endorsed the Project under its Resolution No. 03-96-2003. On Dec. 30, 2003, a Supply Contract Agreement with CNMEG was executed, which became effective on July 23, 2004.

The CoA stated that Northrail needed to issue a CAF for the local counterpart financing of the project amounting to $86.91 million.

CoA noted that Northrail also failed to issue the CAF for phase 1, section 1 of the project �wherein (Northrail) management claimed that 95 percent of the cost of the supply contract will be sourced from loans provided by the China EximBank while the local counterpart will be covered by loans to be guaranteed and arranged by PhilExim and later by the Development Bank of the Philippines.�

The initial phase of the project was bugged by the inability of Northrail to secure the local counterpart financing.

Despite this, Northrail proceeded with the execution of the contract for Phase1, Section 2, CoA said.

�In the absence of the CAF, there is no assurance that the project will be implemented on time and Northrail might face the same problems previously encountered in Phase I, Section 1, particularly in incurring of higher commitment fees,� according to the CoA.

The delay in obtaining the local counterpart fund for the project�s initial phase resulted in the jacking up of commitment fees, which are paid on unused loans, that reached P25.7 million.

�Northrail also did not benefit on the additional cost of P6.2 million incurred as processing fee for the application of guarantee with PhilExim due to the termination of the fund arranging agreement,� the CoA noted.

As early as 2003, Northrail started looking for the local counterpart funds needed to finance the Northrail Project Phase I, Section I, according to CoA. �On Sept. 26, 2003, Northrail applied for a guarantee facility with PhilExim wherein it paid P6,198,232 as processing fee in compliance with the pre-evaluation requirements,� it said.

The negotiation for the guarantee took time due to conditions such as chattel mortgage on the project assets, real estate mortgage, BCDA guarantee to PhilExim, cash intercept mechanism or waterfall account or debt service account with payment of the guaranteed PhilExim obligation as first priority.

Also required were written consents from the Department of Finance, Philippine National Railways, National Housing Authority, Department of Budget and Management and other concerned government agencies on the structure of the escrow or waterfall Account.

Negotiations with PhilExim on Northrail�s guarantee facility as well as the fund arranging activities reached an impasse after one of the funders for the project management support team, First Metro Investment Corporation (FMIC), refused to accept the latter�s guarantee because of a court order subjecting a similar guarantee of PhilExim to a stay order and suspending payment of the obligation in the case of the Nations Granary Inc., according to CoA.

The fund arranging agreement with PhilExim was consequently terminated on March 30, 2007, after accepting the proposal of DBP to provide arranger and underwriting services to the Northrail Project, Phase I, Sections I and 2 and requesting for DOF�s willingness to guarantee.

�To date, Northrail is still in the final stage of the loan negotiation,� according to CoA.

The CoA also found other anomalies in the project:

* The contract was granted to CNMEG without the benefit of a public bidding;

* One of the requirements for the release of the first drawdown by China EximBank was the release by Northrail of the five percent downpayment for CNMEG. Aside from the five percent downpayment released to CNMEG, advance payment equivalent to 25 percent of the contract price was also provided in the supply contract agreement for the cost of preparation, mobilization, relocation, etc. The advance payment included the amount of $27.5 million for the right of way (ROW) expenses and public utilities diversion which shall be borne by CNMEG, but the actual works, relocation and diversion shall be the responsibilities of Northrail;

* No surety bond, bank guarantee or irrevocable standby letter of credit of equivalent value was posted by CNMEG for the advance payment although they submitted a performance bank guarantee corresponding to 10 percent of the contract price as down0payment;

* No Certificate of Availability of Funds was issued prior to signing of the contract;

* All taxes, duties and other charges levied by the Government of the Philippines shall be borne by Northrail;

* The contract agreement with CNMEG includes design. However, said design has not been prepared and submitted before the implementation of the contract agreement, hence, said provision may be considered disadvan-tageous since Northrail is deprived of the option to determine whether the design conforms with the requirement of Northrail vis-�-vis the contract cost;

* The supply contract agreement between Northrail and CNMEG dated December 2003 preceded the buyer�s credit loan agreement dated February 26, 2004;

* �Tied loan� which requires China EximBank to nominate the contractor for the project to be financed by the loan is illegal because it is not among the alternative methods of procurement as enumerated under Sec. 48 of RA 9184;

* The amount of $421 million is a loan to the Republic of the Philippines and after the loan contract has been concluded, the amount should have been deposited to the account of the Republic of the Philippines;

* Additional one percent will be charged to the project by the Philippine government through the DOF as provided under the subsidiary loan agreement between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and Northrail for the Export-Import Bank of China Loan for the Northrail Project, Phase 1, Section 1.

Labels: , ,

US court dismisses Bolante's habeas corpus petition anew

What's your next move Joc-joc Bolante?

US court dismisses Bolante's habeas corpus petition anew
09/21/2008
CHICAGO, Illinois - The attempt of former Philippine agriculture secretary Jocelyn "Joc-Joc" Bolante to shield himself from persecution was again junked by a US court.

GMANews.TV on Sunday learned that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin in Milwaukee had dismissed the petition for a habeas corpus filed by Bolante last August 15.

Habeas corpus is a legal action by which an individual can seek relief from unlawful detention. Bolante has been detained at the Kenosha County Detention Center in Wisconsin for the last two years after fleeing the Philippines when the fertilizer scam broke out.

Bolante became controversial in the Philippines after he was alleged of being the “main architect" of the scam in the P728-million fertilizer fund that reportedly did not benefit poor farmers but went to the 2004 presidential campaign kitty of Gloria Macapagal Arroyo.

Earlier, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago turned down Bolante’s petition for review of his asylum claim. In the August 27 nine-page decision penned by Judge William J. Bauer, the court ruled that Bolante “cannot meet his burden of proof on his asylum claim, (thus) withholding of removal (deportation) claim must fail a fortiori." GMANews.TV

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Dismissed justice: FG Miguel Arroyo behind my ouster

Dismissed justice: FG behind my ouster


By Aries Rufo, Newsbreak, abs-cbnNEWS.com | 09/16/2008 6:05 PM
For three hours, the mobile phone of Court of Appeals Justice Vicente Roxas kept on ringing but the magistrate was not in the mood to answer the call. It was the afternoon of May 30, and the corporate war between the Lopez group and the Government Insurance System had just reached the CA. A raffle held earlier in the day had picked Roxas as the ponente of the case.

The caller ID displayed the name of a ranking government official, who is known to Roxas. He then received a text message with clear instructions: for him to decide in favor of GSIS over the Meralco case. The instruction, the text said, was from the First Gentleman Miguel “Mike” Arroyo. The text said this was “for the Filipino people.

"I should have accepted the call,” Roxas said, with a tinge of regret and partly in jest.

We interviewed Roxas Monday afternoon and asked him to confirm a report we gathered that Mr. Arroyo tried to reach him when the Meralco case landed on his lap. He hedged at first, but related the attempts to reach him through his mobile phone.

Roxas said his refusal to take the call could have angered the powers-that-be and thus began the orchestrated drive to destroy his reputation. “You destroy the ponente, you destroy the (Meralco decision),” Roxas said.

The 8th division of the CA had ruled that the Securities and Exchange Commission has no jurisdiction over the Meralco row, as it nullified the SEC cease-and-desist order against Meralco from validating the proxy votes of the Lopez group during the May 27 stockholders’ meeting.

It was a scheme he was only able to make sense of after the SC dismissed him from office last week. The rest of this story

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, September 09, 2008

SC sacks CA justice, suspends another in bribery scandal

SC sacks CA justice, suspends another in bribery scandal

abs-cbnNEWS.com | 09/09/2008 4:16 PM
The Supreme Court (SC) dismissed from the judiciary Court of Appeals (CA) Justice Vicente Roxas and suspended CA Justice Jose Sabio for two months for their irregularities and improprieties in connection with the bribery scandal involving the Manila Electric Co. and Government Service Insurance System (Meralco-GSIS) case.
Two out of the 15 justices did not take part in the decision imposing penalties on the erring CA justices.
Twelve SC justices voted to dismiss Roxas while one voted for suspension. He was dismissed with forfeiture of all benefits except accrued benefits.
In Sabio's case, 10 voted to suspend him without pay for two months, one voted for a six-month suspension, one voted for a reprimand since he was the whistleblower, and one voted for dismissal.
The SC reprimanded Court of Appeals Presiding Justice Conrado Vasquez for his failed leadership in handling the bribery case.

The SC admonished Justice Myrna Dimaranan-Vidal for allowing herself to be rushed by Justice Roxas to sign the July 8, 2008 decision granting Meralco's request for a temporary restraining order, which allowed the election of a new board and the Lopez family to maintain control of Meralco.
As for CA Justice Bienvenido Reyes, the SC found him guilty of simple misconduct. He was reprimanded and given a stern warning.

The SC called on the Department of Justice to conduct a preliminary investigation of businessman Francis de Borja, who allegedly tried to bribe Justice Sabio with P10 million so that another justice can handle the Meralco-GSIS case.

With respect to Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) Chairman Camilo Sabio, the SC directed the Office of the Bar Confidant to conduct disbarment proceedings against Camilo for trying to influence his brother, Jose, to support the GSIS in its battle for control of Meralco. The rest of this story

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, September 02, 2008

US Court of Appeals rejects Bolante's latest asylum plea

Joc-Joc Bolante is untouchable under the corrupt Arroyo regime. The anti-graft court, Sandiganbayan is still in investigation stage for the alleged P328 million fertilizer scam. We expect another Moro-Moro stage arrest upon his arrival in Manila.

US Court of Appeals rejects Bolante's latest asylum plea
BY JOSEPH G. LARIOSA, GMANews.TV
09/02/2008 | 02:45 PM
CHICAGO, Illinois – It was an unsolicited birthday gift Jocelyn “Joc-Joc" I. Bolante is better off without.

On the eve of his 57th birthday last August 27, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit based in Chicago, Illinois, denied his petition for review of his asylum claim.

The court also affirmed the judgment of the Chicago Immigration Judge (IJ) as supplemented by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA).

In a nine-page opinion written by Circuit Judge William J. Bauer for the three-court panel, the Seventh Circuit ruled that Mr. Bolante, the former Philippine Agriculture Undersecretary, “cannot meet his burden of proof on his asylum claim, withholding of removal (deportation) claim must fail a fortiori."

“Bolante’s fear of persecution is objectively unreasonable. Bolante has not produced enough specifics or details about the fear of persecution that he faces in the Philippines to carry his burden," the court added.

The lawyer of Bolante did not respond to an email message seeking comment on the latest ruling. Bolante turned 57 on August 28. GMA News This is the rest of the story.

Labels: , ,

free web counter
free web counter